Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Prism bricks black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 456 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is a little bit better than the Apple iPhone XS Max, with a score of 92.9 against 84.5. The Galaxy A71 5G UW body is newer and a bit lighter than the Apple iPhone XS Max's, but it is also just a little bit thicker. IPhone XS Max counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a lot better camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
Galaxy A71 5G UW not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.