Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-09-21 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 10.26 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is much better than Galaxy C5, getting an 84.5 score against 76.4. Even though the iPhone XS Max is extremely newer than Galaxy C5, it is much heavier and somewhat thicker. The Apple iPhone XS Max features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a better 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a just a little higher pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy C5 features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy C5 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The iPhone XS Max features a superior processing power than Galaxy C5, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS Max features a better camera than Galaxy C5, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and video. IPhone XS Max features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C5, because it has a 22 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.