Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-09-21 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Blue and Gold |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, having an 84.5 score against 78.4. Even though the iPhone XS Max is newer than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, it's a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a sharper screen than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a higher 1242 x 2688px resolution, a quite larger screen and a little better display pixels density.
The iPhone XS Max counts with a better processing unit than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone XS Max takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy C7 Pro counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy C7 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 256 GB. Galaxy C7 Pro features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.