Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 has a general score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the Apple iPhone XS Max's general score of 84.5. Although the Galaxy F23 is a bit thicker than Apple iPhone XS Max, it's a lot lighter and also a lot newer. IPhone XS Max has a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a quite higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy F23 counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a camera with a way lower 12 MP resolution, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. The Galaxy F23 features a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.