Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 456 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is slightly better than iPhone XS Max, having a general score of 88.1 against 84.5. Even though the Galaxy F62 is newer than the iPhone XS Max, it's just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. IPhone XS Max has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher amount of pixels per display inch, more brightness and a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 resolution.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a higher number of cores (although they are slower). The Galaxy F62 takes much better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 120 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.