Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2018-09-21 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | TFT |
| 456 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 10.26 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a global score of 84.5, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime's 76.9 general score. IPhone XS Max's body is heavier but just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and they were released with only 8 months difference. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a more vivid display than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a bit better display pixels density, a bigger display and a higher 1242 x 2688px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Apple iPhone XS Max has a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. IPhone XS Max captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.