Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than the iPhone XS Max's global score of 84.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than iPhone XS Max. The iPhone XS Max features a little faster processor than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lesser and slower cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone XS Max has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a just a little greater number of pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures slightly better videos and photos than Apple iPhone XS Max. Both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same resolution back camera and the same camera sensor size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip costs more than Apple iPhone XS Max, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.