Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is slightly better than the iPhone XS Max's 84.5 overall score. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the iPhone XS Max. IPhone XS Max features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less and slower CPU cores and 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone XS Max counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better display density and a bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels. Apple iPhone XS Max features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have the same diafragm aperture and a 12 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit superior battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.