Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is better than the Apple iPhone XS Max's global score of 84.5. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot heavier than Apple iPhone XS Max, it's just a little bit thinner and newer. The iPhone XS Max has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 2 lesser and slower cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS Max has a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels back camera, the same video definition, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior storage for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a really longer battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3179mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more than Apple iPhone XS Max, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.