Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is a little bit better than Apple iPhone XS Max's 84.5 score. Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner device than Apple iPhone XS Max, although it is extremely heavier. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone XS Max has a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. IPhone XS Max takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels back facing camera, the iPhone XS Max also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a way better battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 38% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.