Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-09-15 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Bubblegum Blue, Peach Pink, Snowflake White and Truffle Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4250mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is a bit better than the Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, getting an 84.5 score against 81.4. Even though iPhone XS Max is a better phone than the Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, we must tell that it is also incredibly older, much heavier and just a bit thicker. The iPhone XS Max has a bit faster processor than Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, because although it has 2 less processing cores and 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone XS Max counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the iPhone XS Max also has a quite better pixel count per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The iPhone XS Max captures much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE counts with longer battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4250mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.