Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-10-13 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a score of 84.5, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's 81.2 score. IPhone XS Max is an noticeably older cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, but it is just a little bit lighter and thinner anyway. IPhone XS Max features a better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 lesser CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a bit greater display density. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's storage capacity for games and applications is just as good as iPhone XS Max's one, both of them have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite shoots just a bit better videos and photos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot better resolution camera.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a really longer battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4820mAh battery size against 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.