Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-21 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T, having a overall score of 84.5 against 82.2. Even though iPhone XS Max and the Xiaomi Mi 9T were only released with a couple months difference, iPhone XS Max's body is thinner but also just a little bit heavier. IPhone XS Max features a superior processing power than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has 2 less cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone XS Max features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a bit bigger display, a bit more pixels per screen inch, a little higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 and more screen brightness. Xiaomi Mi 9T features a superior camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with improved battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 26 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.