Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-21 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Blue, Gray and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a score of 84.5, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi A3's 79.2 general score. Although iPhone XS Max is older and heavier than Xiaomi Mi A3, it's design is still a bit thinner. IPhone XS Max features a way better screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a much better 1242 x 2688 resolution, a little larger screen and a lot better screen density.
IPhone XS Max has a superior performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The Xiaomi Mi A3 has a superior camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more megapixels camera.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi A3 has longer battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4030mAh battery size against 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.