Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| 2018-09-21 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max has an overall score of 84.5, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's overall score of 83.8. The Apple iPhone XS Max design is just a little bit thinner but just a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and they were only released with a couple months difference.
Apple iPhone XS Max features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a little larger display, a better resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a little greater pixels count in each inch of display. IPhone XS Max counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS Max takes a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same resolution camera, a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a 0.39 inches sensor, the iPhone XS Max also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a much greater memory for apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3400mAh battery size against 3179mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.