Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, with a global score of 84.5 against 84.3. The Apple iPhone XS Max is an a lot older and notably thicker cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, but Apple could make it a little bit lighter anyway. The iPhone XS Max counts with a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has 8 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much better display than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has a just a little worse display pixels density, it also counts with way more brightness, a better 2224 x 2488 resolution and a bigger screen. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a lot larger back camera sensor, a way better resolution camera in the back, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much better memory for apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 60% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.