Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is a bit better than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, getting a overall score of 84.5 against 79.5. IPhone XS Max's construction is somewhat thinner than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it is a bit heavier and was released 5 years before. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a slightly better looking display than iPhone XS Max, because it has a just a bit better screen density, way more display brightness, a slightly better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The iPhone XS Max has a much better processing power than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 62% more battery size. IPhone XS Max captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.