Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max has an overall score of 84.5, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's 81.6 overall score. The Apple iPhone XS Max is an older phone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but Apple was able to make it somewhat thinner and a bit lighter. Apple iPhone XS Max features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a brighter display, a quite higher pixels count per inch of screen and a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution.
IPhone XS Max counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures much clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a very superior battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 62 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.