Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | -- |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a global score of 84.5, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11's 82.2 overall score. The iPhone XS Max construction is somewhat thinner but a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11. The iPhone XS Max counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone XS Max features a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, although it has a bit lower pixel density, a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a very superior battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. IPhone XS Max features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.