Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Ochre and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, having an 84.5 score against 76.6. Despite of the fact the iPhone XS Max is older and heavier than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it's body is still a little bit thinner. Apple iPhone XS Max features just a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has a just a bit greater pixel count in each inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels.
The Apple iPhone XS Max features a little better processing power than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
IPhone XS Max counts with a little bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution, a much smaller back-facing camera sensor taking much worse quality videos and photos and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features longer battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.