Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-03-30 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is much better than the ZTE Axon 11, with an 84.5 score against 76. The Apple iPhone XS Max design is a little thinner than the ZTE Axon 11, but it is somewhat heavier and was released about 19 months before. IPhone XS Max has just a little better processing power than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has less RAM and less processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone XS Max features a slightly better looking display than ZTE Axon 11, and although they both have a display with the same size, the iPhone XS Max also has a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a just a little greater pixels density. The ZTE Axon 11 features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 2 TB and more internal memory capacity.
ZTE Axon 11 counts with better battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. IPhone XS Max shoots slightly better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better captures in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.