Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-09-21 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is a bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's global score of 80.3. The iPhone XS body is notably newer and just a little bit lighter, but just a little thicker than the Google Nexus 6P. The iPhone XS has a faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory and a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XS features a little bit better screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a bit worse 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The iPhone XS captures clearer videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lesser megapixels resolution camera and a smaller camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and images, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
The Google Nexus 6P has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. Google Nexus 6P features better battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Nexus 6P. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Nexus 6P, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.