Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a overall score of 84.2 against 76.4. The iPhone XS construction is much newer and thinner, but just a little heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Apple iPhone XS counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit, a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (although they are slower).
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a bit better looking display than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The iPhone XS counts with a way bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal memory.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 2659mAh. IPhone XS captures a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light images.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone XS, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.