Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Mystic indigo |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's global score of 79.7. Apple iPhone XS is an older phone than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but it is thinner and just a bit lighter anyway. Apple iPhone XS features a better performing processing unit than Moto G Stylus, because although it has less processing cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XS has a better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display pixels density and a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Moto G Stylus has a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Moto G Stylus captures much clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot more MP back camera and a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone XS, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G Stylus, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.