Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-21 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Gray and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is a little bit better than the Moto Z4, having a general score of 84.2 against 79.8. Apple iPhone XS is a just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than the Moto Z4. Apple iPhone XS counts with a superior performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has lesser cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a better screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a little greater screen pixel density. The Moto Z4 features a better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto Z4 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a larger diafragm aperture and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Moto Z4 has a superior storage for games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Moto Z4 has a much longer battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 35% bigger battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z4. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone XS, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z4, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.