Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone XS's general score of 84.2. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's design is newer than the Apple iPhone XS's, although it's just a bit heavier and a little thicker. IPhone XS features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS features a bit better screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px. Galaxy A71 5G has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage.
Galaxy A71 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G takes greater photographs and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels and a much larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also by far the cheapest, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.