Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-09-21 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is slightly better than Galaxy C9 Pro, with a general score of 84.2 against 81. The iPhone XS design is newer and just a little lighter than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it's also a little thicker. The iPhone XS has a better performing CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone XS counts with a sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a greater pixels density. Apple iPhone XS captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than iPhone XS, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.