Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Although iPhone XS is much older and a lot thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. The iPhone XS has a much faster processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 lesser processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better looking screen than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a way bigger display, a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a really brighter display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 2659mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than iPhone XS, because it has a way more MP back camera, a lot larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger aperture to take better captures in low-light situations.
The Apple iPhone XS is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.