Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. The iPhone XS body has the same thickness than vivo X60 Pro, but it is a little lighter. IPhone XS counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone XS features a bit more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a just a bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Vivo X60 Pro features a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XS, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the vivo X60 Pro also has a way bigger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Vivo X60 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.