Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| 2018-09-21 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is just a bit better than the iPhone XS, having an 85.5 score against 84.2. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker device than the iPhone XS. IPhone XS counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1125 x 2436 resolution, a just a little greater screen density and a quite brighter screen. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XS, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light images, they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the same 60 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a 12 MP.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.