Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| HarmonyOS 2 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Silver and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 990E (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP14 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Mate 40E 4G, getting a overall score of 98.9 against 73.7. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is a little bit thinner but a little bit heavier than the Mate 40E 4G. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra works with Android 13 OS, and Mate 40E 4G comes with HarmonyOS 2 OS.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much greater processing power than Mate 40E 4G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Mate 40E 4G, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a just a little better screen pixel density and a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior storage for games and applications than Mate 40E 4G, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater camera than Apple Mate 40E 4G, because it has a back facing camera with a way better 108 megapixels resolution and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little longer battery lifetime than Apple Mate 40E 4G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.