Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| HarmonyOS 2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Silver and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 990E (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP14 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is better than the Apple Mate 40E 4G's global score of 73.7. Samsung Galaxy S9 is a just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Apple Mate 40E 4G. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much better looking display than Mate 40E 4G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy S9 counts with a very superior CPU than Mate 40E 4G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy S9 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Apple Mate 40E 4G, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Apple Mate 40E 4G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 400 GB. The Mate 40E 4G has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.