Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| HarmonyOS 2 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Silver and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 990E (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP14 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is a bit better than Apple Mate 40E 4G's 73.7 overall score. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system, and Apple Mate 40E 4G has HarmonyOS 2 operating system. Although it's the best in this review, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is incredibly heavier and much thicker than Apple Mate 40E 4G.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more vivid screen than Mate 40E 4G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater display pixel density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Apple Mate 40E 4G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much more powerful CPU than Mate 40E 4G, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better battery performance than Apple Mate 40E 4G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Mate 40E 4G captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, it also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.