Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.96 x 2.52 x 0.41 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Yellow | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8212 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 208 hours standby time 9.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is way better than ARCHOS 40 Cesium's general score of 48.3. The LG V35 ThinQ design is a lot thinner but a lot heavier than ARCHOS 40 Cesium. LG V35 ThinQ features a superior performance than ARCHOS 40 Cesium, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 5,5 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
LG V35 ThinQ features a better screen than ARCHOS 40 Cesium, because it has a way bigger display, a lot higher pixels density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The LG V35 ThinQ takes much clearer videos and photos than ARCHOS 40 Cesium, because it has a much better (4K) video definition and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than ARCHOS 40 Cesium, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better battery lifetime than ARCHOS 40 Cesium, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than the ARCHOS 40 Cesium, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.