Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.92 x 2.56 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.37 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is way better than the ARCHOS 40 Titanium, having an 80 score against 45.8. Google Pixel 3 is a just a little thinner but heavier cellphone than ARCHOS 40 Titanium. The Google Pixel 3 has a slightly better screen than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2160 resolution, a lot larger display and a way greater pixel quantity per display inch.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a better performing processor than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more CPU cores and more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 3 has a very superior memory to install games and applications than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, although it has no slot for external memory cards.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, because it has a 94 percent larger battery size. Google Pixel 3 captures much clearer photographs and videos than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much better (4K) video resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 costs a bit more money than the ARCHOS 40 Titanium, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.