Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.92 x 2.56 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.37 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a lot better than the ARCHOS 40 Titanium, having an 83.3 score against 45.8. Galaxy S9's body has the same thickness than the ARCHOS 40 Titanium, but it's extremely heavier. Galaxy S9 has a sharper display than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, because it has a lot larger screen, a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a lot greater screen density.
Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ARCHOS 40 Titanium. Galaxy S9 counts with a greater hardware performance than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with 6 more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, because it has a 100 percent bigger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S9 shoots way better videos and photos than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, because it has a much better 12 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a little more money than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.