Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Yellow | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz + Quad-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a lot better than Archos 50 Diamond's 60.6 overall score. The LG V35 ThinQ is a somewhat heavier but just a little thinner phone than Archos 50 Diamond. Archos 50 Diamond features a bit sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a just a little less pixels per inch in the display and a bit smaller display.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Archos 50 Diamond, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Archos 50 Diamond, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor and a 32 bits processor against 64-bits, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with 4 GB more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features superior battery lifetime than Archos 50 Diamond, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 2700mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots a lot better photos and videos than Archos 50 Diamond, and although they both have a back camera with a 16 mega-pixels resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a lot better (4K) video resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than Archos 50 Diamond, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.