Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.6 | 66.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Nokia |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-01-25 |
| 5.75 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.03 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz + Quad-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 505 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 Plus is slightly better than the Archos 50 Diamond, having a 66.4 score against 60.6. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Nokia 3.1 Plus has newer 9.0 Pie version and Archos 50 Diamond has Android 4.4.4. Nokia 3.1 Plus is a thicker and heavier phone than Archos 50 Diamond.
The Archos 50 Diamond has a much better looking screen than Nokia 3.1 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much better display pixel density. The Nokia 3.1 Plus has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Archos 50 Diamond, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Archos 50 Diamond has a bit better CPU than Nokia 3.1 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount, the Archos 50 Diamond also has a graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor. Nokia 3.1 Plus has longer battery life than Archos 50 Diamond, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
The Nokia 3.1 Plus counts with a bit better camera than Archos 50 Diamond, although it has a worse 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a lower resolution back facing camera.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Nokia 3.1 Plus is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.