Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 60.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz + Quad-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 (500 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.64 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 80.7, which is a lot better than the Archos 50 Diamond's 60.6 general score. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has newer 5.0 version while Archos 50 Diamond has Android 4.4.4. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Galaxy Note 3 is a heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than Archos 50 Diamond.
Archos 50 Diamond features a slightly better display than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1920 x 1080px, the Archos 50 Diamond also counts with a just a bit greater screen density. Archos 50 Diamond features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and a weaker GPU running at 500 MHz, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Archos 50 Diamond also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 takes much better photographs and videos than Archos 50 Diamond, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much better storage to store more games and applications than Archos 50 Diamond, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows 64 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with better battery lifetime than Archos 50 Diamond, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
The Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Archos 50 Diamond.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.