Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-08-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Yellow | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz + Quad-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active is way better than Archos 50 Diamond, with a global score of 81.9 against 60.6. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, the Galaxy S8 Active construction is thicker and heavier than the Archos 50 Diamond. The Archos 50 Diamond counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy S8 Active, although it has a quite worse screen density, a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little bit smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much better memory to store more games and applications than Archos 50 Diamond, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Archos 50 Diamond has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has less RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the Archos 50 Diamond also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processor.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a superior battery performance than Archos 50 Diamond, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Galaxy S8 Active takes way better photographs and videos than Archos 50 Diamond, because although it has a much less MP back camera, it also counts with a lot better video definition.
Galaxy S8 Active is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.