Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.63 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6735P chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus, getting an 81.3 score against 51.3. The LG V35 ThinQ is a just a little bit lighter and extremely thinner cellphone than the ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better looking screen than ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus, because it has a way greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen, a larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater processing power than ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ takes much better videos and photos than ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus, because it has a higher 16 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot better video quality. The LG V35 ThinQ features a really longer battery life than ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.