Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46 | 73.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-07-13 |
| 5.69 x 2.90 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| -- | Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 105.00 | $ 107.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 220 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy J7 Star has a score of 73.1, which is much better than the ARCHOS 50 Titanium's global score of 46. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy J7 Star has a newer 9.0 Pie version while ARCHOS 50 Titanium has Android 4.2.2 version. The Galaxy J7 Star is a somewhat heavier but thinner phone than the ARCHOS 50 Titanium.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star counts with just a little better processing power than ARCHOS 50 Titanium, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. ARCHOS 50 Titanium features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Star, although it has a little bit smaller display, a bit worse pixel density and a way worse resolution of 960 x 540 pixels.
Galaxy J7 Star has a way better camera than ARCHOS 50 Titanium, because it has a much better (Full HD) video quality and a back-facing camera with a way higher 13 MP resolution. The Galaxy J7 Star has a much bigger memory for applications and games than ARCHOS 50 Titanium. The Galaxy J7 Star has a way better battery duration than ARCHOS 50 Titanium, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Galaxy J7 Star costs a bit more than the ARCHOS 50 Titanium, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.