Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 4.0 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.69 x 2.90 x 0.39 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 105.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 220 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket has an overall score of 71.5, which is a lot better than ARCHOS 50 Titanium's 46 global score. The Galaxy S III Cricket is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the ARCHOS 50 Titanium. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S III Cricket has the older 4.0 version and ARCHOS 50 Titanium has Android 4.2.2.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a bit better looking screen than ARCHOS 50 Titanium, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1280 x 720 resolution. The Galaxy S III Cricket has a little bit better performance than ARCHOS 50 Titanium, because although it has a slower graphics processing unit, and they both have a Dual-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with 1,5 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S III Cricket features a way better camera than ARCHOS 50 Titanium, because it has a back camera with a way higher 8 MP resolution and a much higher video definition. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than ARCHOS 50 Titanium.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket and ARCHOS 50 Titanium have incredibly similar batteries duration.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy S III Cricket is also a bit cheaper, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.