Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.71 x 2.81 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is much better than the ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G's 52.4 global score. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a bigger screen and a way greater quantity of pixels per screen inch.
LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a quite better hardware performance than ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and 5 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior battery lifetime than ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 2000mAh. LG V35 ThinQ takes a lot better photographs and videos than ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G, because it has a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than the ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.