Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.78 x 2.87 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Purple | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 220 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1900mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than the ARCHOS 50b Platinum's global score of 48.8. These phones include Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and ARCHOS 50b Platinum has Android 4.4.2. The LG V50 ThinQ construction has the same thickness than ARCHOS 50b Platinum, but it is heavier.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a brighter screen than ARCHOS 50b Platinum, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a bigger screen and a way higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display. LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than ARCHOS 50b Platinum, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 124 GB more internal memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior processing power than ARCHOS 50b Platinum, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores and 5,5 GB more RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a greater camera than ARCHOS 50b Platinum, because it has a back camera with a much higher resolution and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior battery life than ARCHOS 50b Platinum, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 1900mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the ARCHOS 50b Platinum, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.