Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.89 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6732 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP2 (Dual-Core 416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is way better than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G's 53.8 score. The LG V35 ThinQ features a more vivid screen than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because it has a bigger screen, a much better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a way higher display pixel density. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU and a 32-bit processor instead of 64-bits, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ has better battery lifetime than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ shoots much better photographs and videos than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because it has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a much higher (4K) video quality.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.