Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.89 x 0.36 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6732 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP2 (Dual-Core 416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is way better than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, with a overall score of 81.9 against 53.8. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a better display than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because it has a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution, a much better pixels density and a bigger display. The ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an extra graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active captures a lot better pictures and videos than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with a lot better resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Galaxy S8 Active features a really longer battery lifetime than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because it has a 60% greater battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S8 Active is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.