Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| 2014-02-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.71 x 2.75 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is much better than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, with a score of 82.5 against 52.6. The Google Pixel 2 XL construction is noticeably newer, but heavier and just a bit thicker than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a brighter screen than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because it has a larger display, a much higher pixels amount per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better performance than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, and they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 2 XL also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 2 XL has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 XL takes a lot better pictures and videos than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with a much better resolution. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a very superior battery performance than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because it has a 3520mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 2 XL is also cheaper, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.