Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 52.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Motorola |
| Android 4.2 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2014-02-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.71 x 2.75 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a lot better than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, having a 76.4 score against 52.6. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has a newer 4.4.4 version while ARCHOS 50c Oxygen has Android 4.2, providing a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements. The Motorola DROID Turbo is better than the ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, we must note that it's also a extremely thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit faster CPU than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because although it has a worse graphics co-processor and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a lot better looking screen than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because it has a little larger screen, a way higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a way better display density.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a greater camera than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because it has a much better resolution camera in the back and a lot higher (4K) video definition. Motorola DROID Turbo features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 32 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a superior battery duration than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because it has a 95 percent more battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit more expensive than the ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.