Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| 2014-02-20 | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.71 x 2.75 x 0.30 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is way better than the ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, getting a score of 83.3 against 52.6. The Galaxy S9 is a much newer cellphone than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, although it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a bit faster processing unit than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S9 also counts with 3 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a better looking screen than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution, a larger screen and a much greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much better camera than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because it has a much more MP camera and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much better storage for applications and games than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy S9 counts with a much better battery lifetime than ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a bit more expensive than the ARCHOS 50c Oxygen, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.